For years, advocates have pushed for statewide LGBTQ+ protections in Michigan, but progress has been slow. So, what happens when state-level action stalls? Cities and townships step up. Across Michigan, local governments are enacting non-discrimination ordinances, offering vital safeguards against bias based on sexual orientation and gender identity. But why is this patchwork approach so important, and what impact is it really having?
The number is impressive: over 45 local government agencies in Michigan have adopted non-discrimination ordinances. It started with East Lansing, and the momentum hasn't stopped. These ordinances generally extend protections in housing, employment, and public accommodations – areas where state law falls short. But not all are created equal; some offer more comprehensive coverage than others.
While many ordinances include both sexual orientation and gender identity/expression, some are less comprehensive. A few may only cover housing and public accommodations, omitting employment protections. This variability highlights the ongoing need for a consistent statewide standard.
Recently, cities like Howell and Portage have garnered attention for their commitment to LGBTQ+ rights. In Howell, Councilman Steve Manor emphasized the strong support from the business community for the ordinance. Based on the Battle Creek ordinance, it aims to supplement existing federal anti-discrimination law. Portage followed suit, extending protections after a public meeting with considerable community engagement. It's clear that local leaders are listening to their constituents and taking action.
"Howell and Portage are to be commended for standing up for equality and fairness and against discrimination." - Equality Michigan Executive Director Stephanie White
The Michigan legislature has yet to amend the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA) to explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity. This inaction has fueled the local ordinance movement. For years, proposed amendments to ELCRA have been introduced, but they haven't made it to a vote. Is it political gridlock? A lack of understanding? Whatever the reason, the consequences are real for LGBTQ+ Michiganders.
Amending ELCRA would create a consistent, statewide standard for non-discrimination. It would eliminate the need for a patchwork of local ordinances and ensure that LGBTQ+ individuals are protected regardless of where they live or work in Michigan. Imagine the peace of mind that would bring! Plus, it would bring Michigan in line with a growing number of states that already have these protections in place.
The adoption of ordinances by cities like Howell and Portage serves as a powerful reminder of the state's failure to act. These local initiatives demonstrate a clear demand for LGBTQ+ equality and put pressure on state lawmakers to finally address the issue.
What does all this mean for everyday Michiganders? These ordinances can have a tangible impact on people's lives, ensuring they aren't denied housing, jobs, or services simply because of who they are. It's about creating a more inclusive and equitable society for everyone.
Consider this: a person could be fired from their job in one Michigan city for being gay, but be protected from that same discrimination just a few miles away in a city with a non-discrimination ordinance. Does that seem fair? Of course not. This inconsistency underscores the urgent need for statewide protections.
Here's a list of Michigan cities and townships that have taken the lead on LGBTQ+ rights by enacting non-discrimination ordinances (list may not be exhaustive):
The momentum behind local ordinances is undeniable. But the ultimate goal remains statewide protection for all LGBTQ+ Michiganders. What can you do?
The fight for equality is far from over. But with continued advocacy and action, we can create a more inclusive and just Michigan for all.